Considerable interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the Netherlands- A nationwide evaluation study.

AIMS: Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are eligible for first-line immune checkpoint inhibition if their tumour is positive for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) determined by the combined positive score (CPS). This nationwide study, using real-world data, investigated the developing PD-L1 testing landscape in the first 3 years after introduction of the test in HNSCC and examined interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity rates. METHODS: Pathology reports of HNSCC patients mentioning PD-L1 were extracted from the Dutch Pathology Registry (Palga). Tumour and PD-L1 testing characteristics were analysed per year and interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity rates was assessed using funnel plots with 95% confidence limits around the overall mean. RESULTS: A total of 817 PD-L1 tests were reported in 702 patients among 19 laboratories; 85.2% of the tests on histological material were stated to be positive. The national PD-L1 positivity rate differed significantly per year during the study period (79.7-89.9%). The use of the recommended 22C3 antibody increased from 59.9 to 74.3%. A total of 673 PD-L1 tests on histological material from 12 laboratories were analysed to investigate interlaboratory variation. Four (33%) deviated significantly from the national mean of PD-L1-positive cases using CPS ≥ 1 cut-off, while two (17%) deviated significantly for CPS ≥ 20 cut-off. CONCLUSION: In the first 3 years of PD-L1 assessment in HNSCC, the testing landscape became more uniform. However, interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity rates between Dutch laboratories was substantial. This implies that there is a need for further test standardisation to reduce this variation.

Nationwide differences in cytology fixation and processing methods and their impact on interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity.

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunostaining, which aids clinicians in decision-making on immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, is sometimes performed on cytological specimens. In this study, differences in cytology fixation and cell block (CB) processing between pathology laboratories were assessed, and the influence of these differences on interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity was investigated. Questionnaires on cytology processing were sent to all Dutch laboratories. Information gathered from the responses was added to data on all Dutch NSCLC patients with a mention of PD-L1 testing in their cytopathology report from July 2017 to December 2018, retrieved from PALGA (the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands). Case mix-adjusted PD-L1 positivity rates were determined for laboratories with known fixation and CB method. The influence of differences in cytology processing on interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity was assessed by comparing positivity rates adjusted for differences in the variables fixative and CB method with positivity rates not adjusted for differences in these variables. Twenty-eight laboratories responded to the survey and reported 19 different combinations of fixation and CB method. Interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity was assessed in 19 laboratories. Correcting for differences in the fixative and CB method resulted in a reduction (from eight (42.1%) to five (26.3%)) in the number of laboratories that differed significantly from the mean in PD-L1 positivity. Substantial variation in cytology fixation and CB processing methods was observed between Dutch pathology laboratories, which partially explains the existing considerable interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity.

Considerable interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity in a nationwide cohort of non-small cell lung cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Immunohistochemical expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is used as a predictive biomarker for prescription of immunotherapy to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Accurate assessment of PD-L1 expression is therefore crucial. In this study, the extent of interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity in the Netherlands was assessed, using real-world clinical pathology data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on all NSCLC patients in the Netherlands with a mention of PD-L1 testing in their pathology report from July 2017 to December 2018 were extracted from PALGA, the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands. PD-L1 positivity rates were determined for each laboratory that performed PD-L1 testing, with separate analyses for histological and cytological material. Two cutoffs (1% and 50%) were used to determine PD-L1 positivity. Differences between laboratories were assessed using funnel plots with 95% confidence limits around the overall mean. RESULTS: 6,354 patients from 30 laboratories were included in the analysis of histology data. At the 1% cutoff, maximum interlaboratory variation was 39.1% (32.7%-71.8%) and ten laboratories (33.3%) differed significantly from the mean. Using the 50% cutoff, four laboratories (13.3%) differed significantly from the mean and maximum variation was 23.1% (17.2%-40.3%). In the analysis of cytology data, 1,868 patients from 23 laboratories were included. Eight laboratories (34.8%) differed significantly from the mean in the analyses of both cutoffs. Maximum variation was 41.2% (32.2%-73.4%) and 29.2% (14.7%-43.9%) using the 1% and 50% cutoffs, respectively. CONCLUSION: Considerable interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity was observed. Variation was largest using the 1% cutoff. At the 50% cutoff, analysis of cytology data demonstrated a higher degree of variation than the analysis of histology data.

False-negative programmed death-ligand 1 immunostaining in ethanol-fixed endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens of non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

AIMS: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunostaining is used to predict which non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients will respond best to treatment with programmed cell death protein 1/PD-L1 inhibitors. PD-L1 immunostaining is sometimes performed on alcohol-fixed cytological specimens instead of on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies or resections. We studied whether ethanol prefixation of clots from endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) results in diminished PD-L1 immunostaining as compared with formalin fixation. METHODS AND RESULTS: FFPE cell blocks from EBUS-TBNA specimens of 54 NSCLC patients were identified. For each case, paired samples were available, consisting of clots directly immersed in formalin and clots prefixed in Fixcyt (50% ethanol). Serial sections were immunostained for PD-L1 by use of the standardised SP263 assay and the 22C3 antibody as a laboratory-developed test (LDT). PD-L1 positivity was determined with two cut-offs (1% and 50%). Concordance of PD-L1 positivity between the formalin-fixed (gold standard) and ethanol-prefixed material was assessed. When the 22C3 LDT was used, 30% and 36% of the ethanol-prefixed specimens showed false-negative results at the 1% and 50% cut-offs, respectively (kappa 0.64 and 0.68). When SP263 was used, 22% of the ethanol-prefixed specimens showed false-negative results at the 1% cut-off (kappa 0.67). At the 50% cut-off, concordance was higher (kappa 0.91), with 12% of the ethanol-prefixed specimens showing false-negative results. CONCLUSION: Ethanol fixation of EBUS-TBNA specimens prior to formalin fixation can result in a considerable number of false-negative PD-L1 immunostaining results when a 1% cut-off is used and immunostaining is performed with SP263 or the 22C3 LDT. The same applies to use of the 50% cut-off when immunostaining is performed with the 22C3 LDT.

Comparison of three PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is being used as predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Several antibodies are available for PD-L1 testing and multiple staining and scoring methods are used. This study aimed to compare the performance of two PD-L1 standardized assays (SP263 and 22C3 pharmDx) and one laboratory-developed test (LDT) (22C3) in HNSCC using the tumor proportion score (TPS) and the combined positive score (CPS). Pretreatment biopsies from 147 HNSCC patients were collected in a tissue-microarray (TMA). Serial sections of the TMA were immunohistochemically stained for PD-L1 expression using 22C3 pharmDx on the Dako Link 48 platform, SP263 on the Ventana Benchmark Ultra platform, and 22C3 as an LDT on the Ventana Benchmark Ultra. Stained slides were assessed for TPS and CPS. Cutoffs of ≥1% and ≥50% for TPS and ≥1 and ≥20 for CPS were used. Concordance between the different staining assays was moderate to poor for TPS (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.46) as well as for CPS (ICC 0.34). When stratifying patients by clinically relevant cutoffs, considerable differences between the assays were observed: concordance was poor for both TPS and CPS. Generally, SP263 stained a higher percentage of cells than the other assays, especially when using the CPS. Moderate concordance was shown between three different PD-L1 immunohistochemical assays and considerable differences in PD-L1 positivity were observed when using clinically relevant cutoffs. This should be taken into account when using PD-L1 expression to guide clinical practice.

Formalin fixation for optimal concordance of programmed death-ligand 1 immunostaining between cytologic and histologic specimens from patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immunohistochemical staining of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is used to determine which patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may benefit most from immunotherapy. Therapeutic management of many patients with NSCLC is based on cytology instead of histology. In this study, concordance of PD-L1 immunostaining between cytology cell blocks and their histologic counterparts was analyzed. Furthermore, the effect of various fixatives and fixation times on PD-L1 immunoreactivity was studied. METHODS: Paired histologic and cytologic samples from 67 patients with NSCLC were collected by performing fine-needle aspiration on pneumonectomy/lobectomy specimens. Formalin-fixed, agar-based or CytoLyt/PreservCyt-fixed Cellient cell blocks were prepared. Sections from cell blocks and tissue blocks were stained with SP263 (standardized assay) and 22C3 (laboratory-developed test) antibodies. PD-L1 scores were compared between histology and cytology. In addition, immunostaining was compared between PD-L1-expressing human cell lines fixed in various fixatives at increasing increments in fixation duration. RESULTS: Agar cell blocks and tissue blocks showed substantial agreement (κ = 0.70 and κ = 0.67, respectively), whereas fair-to-moderate agreement was found between Cellient cell blocks and histology (κ = 0.28 and κ = 0.49, respectively). Cell lines fixed in various alcohol-based fixatives showed less PD-L1 immunoreactivity compared with those fixed in formalin. In contrast to SP263, additional formalin fixation after alcohol fixation resulted in preserved staining intensity using the 22C3 laboratory-developed test and the 22C3 pharmDx assay. CONCLUSIONS: Performing PD-L1 staining on cytologic specimens fixed in alcohol-based fixatives could result in false-negative immunostaining results, whereas fixation in formalin leads to higher and more histology-concordant PD-L1 immunostaining. The deleterious effect of alcohol fixation could be reversed to some degree by postfixation in formalin.

Comparability of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry is used to determine which patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) respond best to treatment with PD-L1 inhibitors. For each inhibitor, a unique immunohistochemical assay was developed. This systematic review gives an up-to-date insight into the comparability of standardised immunohistochemical assays and laboratory-developed tests (LDTs), focusing specifically on tumour cell (TC) staining and scoring. A systematic search was performed identifying publications that assessed interassay, interobserver and/or interlaboratory concordance of PD-L1 assays and LDTs in tissue of NSCLC patients. Of 4294 publications identified through the systematic search, 27 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were of sufficient methodological quality. Studies assessing interassay concordance found high agreement between assays 22C3, 28-8 and SP263 and properly validated LDTs, and lower concordance for comparisons involving SP142. A decrease in concordance, however, is seen with use of cut-offs, which hampers interchangeability of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays and LDTs. Studies assessing interobserver concordance found high agreement for all assays and LDTs, but lower agreement with use of a 1% cut-off. This may be problematic in clinical practice, as discordance between pathologists at this cut-off may result in some patients being denied valuable treatment options. Finally, five studies assessed interlaboratory concordance and found moderate to high agreement levels for various assays and LDTs. However, to assess the actual existence of interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 testing and PD-L1 positivity in clinical practice, studies using real-world clinical pathology data are needed.